SR&ED Audit Preparation: Tips from Experts

Welcome to the G6 Consulting blog, where our aim is not only to navigate you through the complexities of SR&ED claims but also to prepare you for the critical phase of SR&ED audits. At G6 Consulting Inc., we stand as full-service leaders in the domain, having crafted thousands of successful claims over more than a decade. Our expertise spans a variety of industries, making us the trusted partner for your SR&ED journey.

Understanding SR&ED Audits

The SR&ED (Scientific Research & Experimental Development) program represents a significant opportunity for businesses in Canada engaging in research and development. An SR&ED audit is a critical examination of your claim by the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) to ensure compliance and validity of the claimed expenditures and projects.

Common triggers for an SR&ED audit include inconsistencies in documentation, large claims relative to the size of the company, or claims that significantly deviate from previous submissions. Understanding the distinction between financial and technical audits is crucial, as each focuses on different aspects of your claim.

Pre-Audit Preparation

Documentation is Key

Thorough documentation is not just a requirement; it’s your strongest ally in an SR&ED audit. Documentation acts as the foundation of your assertion, furnishing solid evidence to uphold your research and development endeavors. Here’s how to approach it:

The Importance of Thorough Documentation

Project Descriptions: Detailed records of each project’s objectives, hypotheses, experiments, and results. This includes dates, project phases, and the personnel involved. It’s crucial to demonstrate how each project sought to achieve technological advancement.

Expenditures: Precise tracking of all costs associated with your SR&ED projects, including labor, materials, subcontractor fees, and overheads. Ensure each expense is directly linked to specific R&D activities.

Contributions: Document contributions in kind, such as materials or equipment, specifying their use in the R&D process.

Tips on Organizing Documentation Effectively

  • Chronological Organization: Arrange documents by project phase or date to create a clear timeline of activities.
  • Use of Technology: Leverage project management and accounting software to track R&D activities and expenditures in real-time.
  • Accessibility: Ensure documents are easily accessible and organized in a way that they can be readily presented to auditors, with summaries and indexes.

Building Your Case

Compiling evidence and crafting your narrative around the SR&ED criteria is an art that demands attention to detail and a deep understanding of your projects’ technological aspects.

How to Compile Evidence

Technological Advancements: Provide clear examples of how your projects pushed technological boundaries within your field. This can include failures that led to new knowledge.

Uncertainties: Document the technical challenges and uncertainties you faced at the outset, detailing the experiments and analyses conducted to overcome them.

Systematic Investigation: Show the methodical approach taken in your R&D activities, including hypothesis formulation, experimentation, and analysis.

Expert Advice on Highlighting Innovation and Challenges

Use Clear, Concise Language: Avoid jargon and clearly explain how your projects meet the SR&ED criteria. Remember, the auditors may not be experts in your field.

Emphasize the Process Over the Product: Focus on the R&D process — the experiments, the failures, the iterations — rather than just the final product or technology.

Include Quantitative Data: Where possible, use data and metrics to quantify advancements, challenges, and the scope of investigations.

During the Audit

Communication Strategies

Clear and concise communication with the CRA auditor is essential. Not only does it streamline the audit process, but it also greatly improves the chances of a favorable outcome for your SR&ED claim.

The Role of Clear and Concise Communication

  • Understand the Auditor’s Perspective: Recognize that the auditor’s goal is to assess the validity of your claim against the SR&ED program criteria. Provide clear, direct answers to their questions.
  • Simplify Complex Concepts: Break down complex technical details into understandable language. This ensures the auditor grasps the significance of your R&D efforts and how they align with SR&ED criteria.

Preparing Your Team

  • Identify Key Personnel: Determine who among your team has the most thorough understanding of the projects in question. This often includes project managers, lead researchers, and finance personnel who handled the expenditures.
  • Role-Specific Preparation: Equip each selected team member with clear guidance on what to expect and how to communicate effectively with the auditor. This may involve briefing sessions or mock audits to build confidence and coherence in your team’s responses.

Technical Narratives

A compelling technical narrative is a cornerstone of your SR&ED claim, providing a structured story that showcases your projects’ challenges, efforts, and achievements in pursuit of technological advancement.

Crafting Compelling Technical Narratives

  • Structure Your Story: Begin with the problem or uncertainty faced, followed by the hypotheses, the experiments conducted, and the results achieved (or not achieved, as failure can also demonstrate SR&ED eligibility).
  • Emphasize the Scientific Method: Highlight your systematic approach to experimentation and how each step was crucial in addressing the technological uncertainties.

Examples of Effective vs. Ineffective Narratives

Effective Narrative:

  • Begins with a clear description of the technological uncertainty faced by the project.
  • Details the hypotheses formulated as potential solutions.
  • Describes the experimentation process, including the failures and how they led to further understanding or refinement of the hypotheses.
  • Concludes with the results, emphasizing the advancement in technology or knowledge gained, even if the project was not commercially successful.

Ineffective Narrative:

  • Focuses primarily on the commercial success or product development aspects, without addressing the technological uncertainties or the process of experimentation.
  • Lacks detail on the systematic approach taken to resolve the uncertainties, making it difficult to distinguish from routine engineering or product development.
  • Fails to communicate the failures and what was learned from them, missing an opportunity to demonstrate eligibility under the SR&ED program.

Post-Audit Strategies

Responding to Audit Findings

After the auditor presents their findings, your response will play a key role in the final assessment of your SR&ED claim. Here’s how to approach it:

Addressing Questions and Providing Additional Documentation

  • Thorough Review: Carefully review the auditor’s findings and questions. Ensure you fully understand any issues or gaps identified.
  • Constructive Response: Please respond clearly to questions and promptly provide any additional documentation requested. This may include further evidence of project work, more detailed breakdowns of expenditures, or additional technical documentation that substantiates your claim.
  • Engage in Dialogue: If there are discrepancies or misunderstandings, engage in a constructive dialogue with the auditor. Clear up any confusion by providing clear explanations or additional context.

The goal is to address the auditor’s concerns fully and accurately, demonstrating your commitment to transparency and compliance with the SR&ED program requirements.

Understanding Potential Outcomes of an SR&ED Audit

The outcome of an SR&ED audit can vary, ranging from full acceptance of your claim to partial adjustments or, in some cases, denial. Understanding these potential outcomes is essential for effective post-audit strategy.

Potential Outcomes

  • Full Acceptance: The optimal outcome wherein your claim is approved upon submission. This outcome validates your documentation and claim preparation efforts.
  • Partial Adjustments: More common than full acceptance, partial adjustments occur when the CRA accepts some aspects of your claim but reduces or denies others. This may involve disallowing certain expenditures or questioning the eligibility of some projects.
  • Denial: Though less frequent, complete denial of a claim can happen. This usually results from a failure to demonstrate that the work qualifies under the SR&ED criteria or due to inadequate documentation.

Strategies for Each Outcome

  • For Full Acceptance: Use this positive outcome as a benchmark for future claims. Analyze what worked well and apply these practices consistently.
  • For Partial Adjustments: Review the reasons behind the adjustments. Understand which parts of your claim were successful and why others were not. Use this insight to strengthen future claims.
  • For Denial: If you think there has been a misunderstanding or mistake during the audit, you should consider asking for a second review. Learn from the experience by identifying gaps in your documentation or claim preparation and seek professional advice to improve future submissions.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid in the Audit Process

1. Insufficient Documentation

  • Pitfall: Failing to provide detailed documentation that substantiates your R&D activities and expenditures.
  • Avoidance Strategy: Keep thorough records of all R&D activities, including project notes, emails, and financial records, from the outset.

2. Overlooking Eligible Work

  • Pitfall: Not recognizing or documenting work that qualifies for SR&ED, potentially leading to underclaiming.
  • Avoidance Strategy: Educate your team on what constitutes eligible R&D work under the SR&ED program.

3. Poorly Prepared Technical Narratives

  • Pitfall: Technical narratives that fail to clearly articulate the technological advancements and uncertainties can weaken your claim.
  • Avoidance Strategy: Focus on clarity, detail, and relevance to the SR&ED criteria when preparing your narratives.

4. Not Engaging with the Auditor

  • Pitfall: A defensive or non-cooperative stance towards the auditor can create unnecessary friction and hinder the audit process.
  • Avoidance Strategy: Approach the audit as a collaborative process. Be open, transparent, and willing to engage in constructive dialogue with the auditor.

5. Lack of Organized Financial Documentation

  • Pitfall: Disorganized financial records can lead to challenges in substantiating the R&D expenditures claimed.
  • Avoidance Strategy: Maintain detailed, organized records of all R&D-related expenses, categorized according to the SR&ED guidelines.


At G6 Consulting, we grasp the intricacies involved in maneuvering through the SR&ED audit procedure and recognize the significance of a meticulously crafted claim. With years of experience and a deep understanding of SR&ED criteria, our experts are committed to guiding our clients through successful audit preparations and beyond. We emphasize the criticality of meticulous documentation, strategic communication, and the crafting of compelling technical narratives. By avoiding common pitfalls and leveraging professional expertise, businesses can significantly enhance their audit readiness. Our team is here to support you in maximizing your SR&ED claim’s potential, ensuring a smooth audit process, and fostering an environment where innovation is not just rewarded but celebrated. Trust G6 Consulting to be your partner in this journey, where every audit is an opportunity for growth and success.

Get your SR&ED done right with G6 Consulting Inc – Canada’s R&D Tax Credit Experts!

G6 Consulting can work with you to build your claim, co-ordinate with your accountant, submit your claim and get you your cheque. No cost until you get paid

Check out our SR&ED overview page to learn more about SR&ED and how to qualify

Contact an Expert for a free no obligation consultation to see if your business can qualify

Check out our SR&ED calculator to get an idea of how big your SR&ED cheque could be

SR&ED Audit Preparation: Tips from Experts
SR&ED Audit Preparation: Tips from Experts